Authors.com

Authors, Writers, Publishers, and Book Readers

We often respond to questions on Yahoo! Answers. The article below is adapted from one of those responses.


Question: Can Someone Check My Grammar?

“There are several factors account for cultural diversity in Europe such as geographical, historical, and religion that prevent the growth of any single homogenous style in the region. The geographical distribution has formed boundaries within the different ethnic groups. Separated by their identity and ideologies, their music has become a signifier of their distinction.”


Answer: This passage is a mess, but the problems go beyond grammar. Let's look at the sentences one at a time and see how they can be improved.


First, here is the summary of problems we will fix.

  • Spelling
  • Sentence subject
  • Excessive words
  • Parallelism
  • Word choice
  • Dangling modifier
  • Number agreement
  • Punctuation/Comma


Sentence One
“There are several factors account for cultural diversity in Europe such as geographical, historical, and religion that prevent the growth of any single homogenous style in the region.”

  1. Spelling: Homogeneous
  2. Subject: “There” always makes a crummy subject for a sentence. Avoid it. Instead, start with “Several factors account....”
  3. Punctuation/commas: The expression “such as geographical, historical, and religion” is a disruptor, i.e., it interrupts the main idea you are communicating. It needs to be separated from the main sentence with commas: “...in Europe, such as geographical, historical, and religion, that prevent....”
  4. Excessive words: “Single” and “homogeneous” are redundant. If the region has a single style, it has a homogeneous style, and vice versa. Choose one. We prefer “single” because it is a simple word.
  5. Parallelism: “Geographical” and “historical” are adjectives. The third item in this series, “religion,” is a noun. All three need to be the same part of speech to make this series parallel. Because you are using these as examples of “factors,” which is a noun, use nouns for the series items: “geography,” “history,” and “religion.”


Sentence Two
“The geographical distribution has formed boundaries within the different ethnic groups.”

  1. Word choice: You can't have boundaries “within” groups—you have boundaries “between” groups. (Note: “between” is correct here, not “among.” Each boundary is between one group and one other group.)
  2. Excessive words: The word “different” is unnecessary. The use of the plural for “ethnic groups” already indicates that multiple, i.e., different, groups exist.


Sentence Three
“Separated by their identity and ideologies, their music has become a signifier of their distinction.”

  1. Dangling modifier: The implied subject of “Separated by their identity and ideologies” is “they.” The subject of “their music has become a signifier of their distinction” is “music.” Because the subject of the introductory phrase isn't the same subject as the main sentence, the introductory phrase is a dangling modifier. Both need the same subject. You could use “they” for both, as in “Separated by their identities and ideologies, they have distinct musical styles.”
  2. Number agreement: Each group has its own ideology, so you correctly used the plural for “ideologies.” However, each group also has its own identity, so you also need the plural “identities.”


Final Result
When we take care of all these issues, we get the following revision:


“Several factors account for cultural diversity in Europe, such as geography, history, and religion, that prevent the growth of a single style in the region. The geographical distribution has formed boundaries between ethnic groups. Separated by their identities and ideologies, they have distinct musical styles.”

Views: 40

Comment by Mark A. Santomieri on July 15, 2010 at 2:52pm
Almost a complete evaluation, but I have a few more technical points to add. . .
In the Chicago Manual of Style, it is said that the ubiquitous dangling subject might require a simple "the" or "that" to bring the sentence alive. "Several factors account for the cultural diversity that exists in Europe." And so such. Some editors, depending on the context and the tone of the manuscript, might disagree, but most would not. We hear what we read, for the most part, and the more clear the writing, the more clear the voice.
Just a thought.

My Best,
M.
Comment by David Bowman on July 15, 2010 at 6:46pm
Mark: The word "the" might be useful to make this smoother, as in "Several factors account for THE cultural diversity in Europe...."

However, we remove "that is/that are" phrases when they contribute neither to clarity nor to grammatical correctness. They are, typically, unnecessary, and they may make the sentence wordy. "That exists" is a form of "that is" phrase. It is not needed here, so we left it out of "...cultural diversity in Europe...."

Now that I look at the sentence again, I can improve it further as follows.
"Geography, history, religion, and other factors create cultural diversity in Europe and prevent the growth of a single style."
Comment by Mark A. Santomieri on July 16, 2010 at 2:22pm
David, I like the rewire. And I do tend to agree that sometimes the overuse of THE and THAT can be a distraction to clarity. There are, however, numerous instances where those two simple words can improve flow. This becomes a matter of style and tempo.
Please don't think that I was being at all antagonistic. I was simply illustrating the way that the language can be manipulated to intended effect. As writers, we often ignore simple things that might improve the readers imaginative "hearing" of what we are writing.
In dialog, for example, writers can get way too wordy. Most folks speak in some form of "clipped". It is unusual, as an example, to hear someone say, "I heard what you were saying" vice "I heard what you said."
The really cool thing about language is that it is situationally malleable. I speak reasonably well in three other languages beside English and have been taught many lessons about the difference between "proper" and "correct".
It behooves us as writers to try to walk that fine line, pen in hand.

My best,
Mark

Comment

You need to be a member of Authors.com to add comments!

Join Authors.com

Sponsored Links

Most Active Members

1. Edward F. T. Charfauros

San Diego, CA, United States

2. RF Husnik

Green Bay, WI, United States

3. Rosemary Morris

Watford, United Kingdom

© 2024   Created by Authors.com.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service