right for someone to have due process and 2nd petition trying to sign

Right to due process or trial

            There are many reasons for due process or trial of persons sentenced or when there if no trial of plea.

1. There is no trial for plea no evidence or jury or judge has reviewed or determined real proof there no right to review witness or cross examine any of this which could bring hidden facts, or credibility or if dishonesty or some lie or some hidden proof for defendants.
2. There is law says the district attorney has reveal all cases that might defend a defendant or facts that might prove person innocence their case decided this and law now wrote from this.
3. I think that only a trial of due process with impartial jury witnesses of both defendant, plaintiff favorable witness will bring the facts.
4. Some facts how could view this scientific or forensic facts that never be addressed which condemn or free a person from punishment
5. I think person who has HAD A PLEA AGREEMENT SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO A TRIAL WHILE SERVING PUNISHMENT WITH REASONABLE DOUBT AS WHAT NEEDED TO WIN CASE ON TRIAL THERE IS NOT THIS THERE IS JUST SURRENDERING TO PLAINTIFF OR PERSON A PERSON COULD ACTUALLY BE VICITIMIZED OR STALKED BE VICTIM FROM OTHER STATES ALL WITH PERSONS CONSTANTLY BULLYING, INTIMIDATING OR HARASSMENT OF THE PERSON.
6. I KNOW THEY SAY THERE IS DOUBLE JEOPARDY IF THERE IS A TRIAL FIRST THERE BEEN NO TRIAL FOR A PERSON WHO TOOK PLEA WHO WANTS SUFFERING TO END ESPECIALLY AFTER YEAR OR MORE THERE THIS IS CRRUEL AND UNUSAL ALREADY SEEMS us CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT 8 ALREADY APPLIES.
7. ABOUT DOUBLE JEOPARDY PERSON SETENCED THEY ALREADY SENTENCED PUNISHED A REVIEW CASE THINK RIGHT TO REVIEW CASES BY LAW RELEASE PERSONS IF MISTAKES OR SOME PROCESS THIS TO Persons sentenced.
8. They random review cases should not a person have right had case reviewed if already or ask for it.
9. They state double jeopardy but could not a person sentence or defendant keep same sentence or release without more torturous punishment in jail while their review or go to trial. They plea, released they trusted already or allowance they should go back just to trial or review facts. The thing double jeopardy if prove shown or facts come around, lessen the things stated the sentence could be reduced or found not guilty. I f found not guilty would they not be innocent persons entitled to full benefits of their life. The facts make allegations less something was couple prison could become a jail sentence or time served, or they served enough time. KM 01/13/2025

10. This could also catch liar, perjury, get damages to the defendant and crimes they committed could be addressed this why I think due process or trial when sentence should be able to reasonable be reviewed.
11. This seems should be an absolute right to someone who did not have a trial because to find guilty it is reasonable doubt. I think plea agreement is like civil a preponderance of evidence and it should be reasonable doubt.
12. Therefore, a person release on plea should be able with US constitution amendment 8 protection should be able to have a trial no matter long it takes for reasonable doubt without further punishment or losing the sentence or change it worse.
13. A trial by impartial jury would be no harm protect right to trial reasonable doubt, review evidence, witnesses and what supposedly took place of allegations, and if there is other relative proof for defendant of course does not exclude facts for either party.

Ken Moorehead 01/13/2025

Please sign this petition to give due process to I, Ken Moorehead and try better due process or guarantee more fairness for others and give trial without more punishment